॥ श्रीकृष्णाय नमः ॥ · Established 3 October 1968 · Hansi, Haryana
Hansi Gita Bhawan TrustHansi · Haryana
The white horses of the chariot at dawn on the field of Kurukshetra, the armies ranged behind

Before the Gita · the family

The Kuru family tree

Shantanu to Abhimanyu, five generations, from the Mahabharata’s own Adi Parva — including the three places where the line does not pass from a father to his son, which is where the war comes from.

How are the Pandavas and the Kauravas related?

They are first cousins. Dhritarashtra and Pandu were brothers; Dhritarashtra’s hundred sons are the Kauravas and Pandu’s five are the Pandavas, and after Pandu’s death the five were raised in Dhritarashtra’s house alongside the hundred. The complication is that neither set descends from King Shantanu by blood: Dhritarashtra and Pandu were fathered by the sage Vyasa on Vichitravirya’s widows under the custom of niyoga, and Pandu’s own five sons were born to Kunti and Madri by a boon. Three times in three generations the line passes by something other than a son fathered by the king, and the war is a dispute about who inherits from a man neither side is descended from.

Hansi Gita Bhawan Trust · Mahabharata, Adi Parva

Generation 1

The king and his two marriages

Shantanu, king of Hastinapura. Everything that follows turns on his second marriage.

Generation 2

The generation that produced no heirs

One son renounces, two die young and childless, and a fourth — born before the marriage — is outside the line altogether.

Generation 3

The three brothers, and who married whom

Fathered by Vyasa, heirs of Vichitravirya. The blind elder, the younger king, and the wise one who could never rule.

Generation 4

The cousins who face each other

The two branches, raised under one roof, and the teachers, kinsmen and allies who had to choose between them.

Generation 5

The children on the field

The next generation, already grown enough to fight. Arjuna finds them at 1.26 when he looks at both armies and sees sons.

Where the line breaks

Three times in three generations

Most family trees of this house are drawn with straight lines from fathers to sons, and the straight lines are wrong. Here is what actually happened, in order.

  1. The heir renounces

    Shantanu wants to marry Satyavati. Her father will agree only if her children inherit — which is impossible while Devavrata, the eldest son and rightful heir, is alive. So Devavrata renounces the throne, and then, because his own sons would one day have a claim, vows lifelong celibacy. The gods are said to have called him Bhishma, the terrible, for the terribleness of the oath.

    What it cost. The one man with an undisputed claim is permanently removed from the succession, and the family is left dependent on Satyavati’s two sons. Both die young and childless. Bhishma is still alive to see the consequence, and is still bound: at 1.12 he is blowing his conch for Duryodhana.

  2. The line is continued by another man

    With Vichitravirya dead and childless, Satyavati calls her first son, Vyasa — born to her before her marriage — to father children on Vichitravirya’s widows under the levirate custom of niyoga. Ambika bears Dhritarashtra, Ambalika bears Pandu, and a serving-woman bears Vidura. All three are Vichitravirya’s heirs in law and Vyasa’s sons in fact.

    What it cost. From this generation on, nobody in the Kuru house descends from Shantanu through his own sons. Vidura, the ablest of the three, is excluded from the throne by his mother’s status and becomes the counsellor who will argue against the war and be overruled. And the author of the Mahabharata is the grandfather of everyone in it.

  3. The sons are born by a boon

    Pandu, king in his blind brother’s place, is cursed so that fathering a child would kill him. Kunti has a mantra given to her in girlhood by which she may call a deva; Yudhishthira, Bhima and Arjuna are born by it, and Madri, using it once, bears the twins. All five are Pandu’s sons in law and in name. The same mantra, used once before her marriage, had already given Kunti a son she set adrift: Karna.

    What it cost. The Pandavas’ claim rests on being Pandu’s sons, and they are Pandu’s sons by a legal fiction their cousins can see as clearly as they can. Duryodhana’s case is not simply greed: his father was the elder, and the men opposite are not his uncle’s children by blood. And the eldest of Kunti’s sons is standing in Duryodhana’s army, unrecognised by anyone including himself.

And so, 1.1

Why the first verse says “mine”

Read the three breaks together and the first verse of the Gita changes. When Dhritarashtra says मामकाः पाण्डवाश्चैव — “my people and the sons of Pandu” — he is not merely being partial. He is stating the position his side actually holds: that his sons are the line and the others are Pandu’s, a separate thing. The Pandavas hold the opposite position with equal sincerity. Neither claim is settled by blood, because after Vyasa there is no blood claim left in this family for anyone to hold. The Gita does not resolve the succession, and neither does this page. What both do is make it possible to see that there was something to resolve.

Read Bhagavad Gita 1.1

Sources

How this page was made

Where this comes from

The Mahabharata, Adi Parva — the Adivamshavatarana and Sambhava sections, which narrate the descent of the Kuru house directly. The Sanskrit critical edition prepared at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute in Pune between 1919 and 1966 is the standard scholarly text and is the reference used for the relationships set out here.

Where it does not come from

Not from television serials, not from comics, and not from modern novels of the Mahabharata, however good. Retellings from a single character’s point of view invent interiority, compress incident and often change the order of events, and they are protected literary works besides. Nothing on this page is drawn from one, and nothing on this site treats one as evidence about the epic.

Where the epic itself disagrees

The recensions of the Mahabharata differ on details — the number and order of Gandhari’s sons, how Karna’s birth is told, the exact terms of Pandu’s curse. Where a detail is disputed this page either omits it or says that it is disputed. What is not disputed, in any recension, is the shape given here: the vow, the niyoga, and the boon, in that order, across three generations.

Common questions

Was Karna really the eldest Pandava?

By birth, yes. The Mahabharata records that Kunti bore Karna before her marriage to Pandu, by the same mantra that later gave her Yudhishthira, Bhima and Arjuna, and set him adrift. He was raised by Adhiratha, a charioteer, and fought for Duryodhana. Nobody on the field at Kurukshetra knows this, including Karna. The Bhagavad Gita never mentions it.

Who was Vyasa to the Kuru family?

Grandfather to all of them, and the author of the poem they are in. He is Satyavati’s son by the sage Parashara, born before her marriage to Shantanu, and he fathered Dhritarashtra, Pandu and Vidura on Vichitravirya’s widows and a serving-woman. The Gita names him at 10.37, and at 18.75 Sanjaya says the sight by which he witnessed the whole dialogue was Vyasa’s gift.

Why couldn’t Vidura be king?

Because his mother was a serving-woman. He is Vyasa’s son exactly as Dhritarashtra and Pandu are, and the epic presents him as the wisest and most upright of the three, but the status of his mother excluded him from the succession. He argued against the war and was overruled. He is not named anywhere in the Bhagavad Gita.

How we reached Kurukshetra All twenty-two people Every name in the Gita